4.5 Article

Differential Evolution Algorithm With Asymmetric Coding for Solving the Reliability Problem of 3D-TLC CT Flash-Memory Storage Systems

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCAD.2021.3117508

Keywords

Asymmetric coding (AC); differential evolution; flash memory; reliability

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 108-2221-E-011-002-MY3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

NAND flash memory is widely used in various devices due to its low-power consumption, high performance, and reliability. However, as the storage density increases, the error rate also rises. To address this issue, researchers propose a differential evolution coding scheme to store data in more reliable cell states and reduce the error rate.
In recent years, NAND flash memory has been widely used in mobile devices, laptops, desktops, and data center storage systems due to its low-power consumption, high performance, high density, lightweight, shock resistance, and high-reliability natures. However, as the stacked layers and the storage density increase, flash memory also suffers from a higher raw bit error rate (RBER) and shorter lifetime. Observing that reliable cell states suffer from less data retention errors and program disturbance, we propose a differential evolution coding scheme to increase the probability of storing data in more reliable cell states, thereby reducing the RBER. We conducted the experiments over a development platform of SSD storage device with 3D-TLC charge trap (CT) NAND flash memory. The experimental results showed that the proposed differential evolution algorithm with asymmetric coding scheme could averagely reduce RBER by 48.88%, 65.45%, 52.61 %, 61.99 %, 80.19%, and 33.18% compared with baseline, asymmetric coding algorithm, asymmetric coding scheme with stripe-pattern elimination algorithm, UAC-nLC, word-line batch score modulation programming, and SCB schemes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available