4.7 Article

Learning End-User Customized Mid-Air Hand Gestures Using a Depth Image Sensor

Journal

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
Volume 22, Issue 17, Pages 16994-17004

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2022.3190913

Keywords

Training; Gesture recognition; Heuristic algorithms; Trajectory; Image sensors; Human computer interaction; Sensor phenomena and characterization; Depth sensor; hand gesture; human-computer interaction; user customization

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61960206007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a method for allowing users to use self-defined mid-air hand gestures as commands for Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). The gesture detection and recognition algorithm is based on pattern matching using 3 separate sets of features. An experiment is conducted to test the recognition rate and false positive ratio of the method.
Interacting with computer applications using actions that are designed by end users themselves instead of pre-defined ones has advantages such as better memorability in some Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) scenarios. In this paper we propose a method for allowing users to use self-defined mid-air hand gestures as commands for HCI after they provide a few training samples for each gesture in front of a depth image sensor. The gesture detection and recognition algorithm is mainly based on pattern matching using 3 separate sets of features, which carry both finger-action and hand-motion information. An experiment in which each subject designed their own set of 8 gestures, provided about 5 samples for each, and then used them to play a game is conducted all in one sitting. During the experiment a recognition rate of 66.7% is achieved with a false positive ratio of 22.2%. Further analyses on the collected dataset shows that a higher recognition rate of up to about 85% can be achieved if more wrong detections were allowed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available