4.6 Article

Joint Transmit and Receive Antenna Selection for Spatial Modulation Systems Using Deep Learning

Journal

IEEE COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS
Volume 26, Issue 9, Pages 2077-2080

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LCOMM.2022.3182213

Keywords

Receiving antennas; Transmitting antennas; Symbols; MIMO communication; Modulation; Deep learning; Convolutional neural networks; MIMO systems; spatial modulation; antenna selection; deep learning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The importance of signal reliability is increasing in today's communication technologies. The selection of antennas at the receiver, transmitter, or both is an important method for increasing signal reliability. Deep learning based technologies, known for their low complexity, low processing times, and high performance, have found applications in various fields including communication, warehouse management, health services, and image processing. This letter introduces a joint transmit and receive antenna selection method for spatial modulation systems and replaces the exhaustive search with deep learning algorithms.
Importance of the signal reliability has started to increase in today's communication technologies. One of the most important methods of increasing signal reliability for communication systems is the selection of antennas at the receiver, transmitter, or both. On the other hand, having low complexity, low processing times and high performance, deep learning (DL) based technologies have started to find a place in various fields such as communication, warehouse management, health services, image processing, and so on. In this letter, we first introduce the joint transmit and receive antenna selection (JTRAS) for spatial modulation (SM) systems, which, as far as we know, has not been studied in detail before, and second, we perform the DL algorithms for JTRAS instead of its exhaustive search.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available