4.6 Article

Normalizing failure: when things go wrong in participatory marine social science fieldwork

Journal

ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE
Volume 79, Issue 8, Pages 2184-2195

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsac153

Keywords

failure; fieldwork; marine social science; participatory research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper argues for the normalization of sharing stories of failure within the scientific community, emphasizing its importance for knowledge advancement, research outcomes, and the well-being of scientists. It highlights the significance of such sharing experiences for early career researchers in setting realistic expectations and reframing failure as a positive force.
Failure is a normal and critical part of the scientific process; however, the admittance of failure remains largely stigmatized within the sciences. In this paper, we argue that sharing stories of failure should be normalized, not only for the advancement of knowledge and improvement of research outcomes, but also for the health and well-being of the scientific community. We feel that this is particularly important for early career researchers, as it will help to set more realistic expectations of a career in science and to help reframe failure as a positive force for good. To do so, we draw upon our recent experiences of failure in participatory marine social science fieldwork. We share our personal perspectives of, among other things, how we felt when confronted with failure in the field, and more importantly, the strategies we used to confront, deal with, and overcome those failures. By doing so, we generate a list of practical steps and considerations that marine social science researchers can follow to help them navigate their own failures in the field, should they occur.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available