4.6 Article

Productivity, pressure, and new perspectives: impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on marine early-career researchers

Journal

ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE
Volume 79, Issue 8, Pages 2298-2310

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsac167

Keywords

early career scientists; intersectional; institutional responses; marine science; reflexive science; SARS-CoV-2; UN Ocean Decade

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted marine early-career researchers (ECRs), exacerbating existing challenges and hindering their success and well-being. The disruption caused by the pandemic has affected networking opportunities, practical experience, and publication production for marine ECRs.
The worldwide disruption caused by the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically impacted the activities of marine scientists working towards the goals of the UN Ocean Decade. As in other disciplines, marine early-career researchers (ECRs) are essential contributors to the development of novel and innovative science. Based on a survey of 322 of our peers, we show that the pandemic negatively impacted marine ECRs in ways that further exacerbate existing structural challenges such as social isolation, job insecurity, and short-term contracts, competitive funding, and work pressure. Furthermore, we find that the success and wellbeing of marine ECRs depends heavily on networking opportunities, gaining practical experience, collecting data, and producing publications, all of which were disrupted by the pandemic. Our analysis shows that those in the earliest stages of their careers feel most vulnerable to long-term career disadvantage as a result of the pandemic. This paper contributes to the empirical body of work about the impacts of the pandemic on marine science and offers recommendations on how marine ECRs should be supported to achieve the UN Ocean Decade's goal of producing the science we need for the ocean we want.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available