4.5 Article

Infrared spectra of benzene ices: Reexamination and comparison of two recent papers and the literature

Journal

ICARUS
Volume 384, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2022.115091

Keywords

Ices; I R spectroscopy; Titan; Organic chemistry

Funding

  1. NASA's Planetary Science Division Internal Scientist Funding Program through the Fundamental Laboratory Research (FLaRe) work package at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compares the infrared spectroscopic results on benzene ices from two recent papers and discusses the qualitative and quantitative differences between them. It identifies errors in one paper that, once corrected, could align the results with the other paper. A solution is provided for an unexplained disagreement with previous literature. The study concludes that the most accurate and extensive set of IR absorption coefficients, band strengths, and optical constants for amorphous and crystalline benzene is presented in the recent publications by the authors. Suggestions are made for future work to address this issue.
Infrared spectroscopic results on benzene (C6H6) ices from two recent papers, one published here, are compared to each other and to literatu r e results from 60 years ago. Qualitative and quantitative differences are described, partly in terms of spectral resolution, and errors in one paper are identified that, once corrected , could bring the two recent publications into agreement with each other. A solution is provided for an unexplained disagreement with the literature noted by the authors of one paper. It is concluded that the only accurate, extensive set of IR absorption coefficients, band strengths, and optical constants now available for amorphous and crystalline benzene are those recently published here by the author and a colleague. Suggestions ar e made for future work to change this situation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available