4.5 Editorial Material

Go together, to go further! Reply to Human-water research: discussion of 'Guiding principles for hydrologists conducting interdisciplinary research and fieldwork with participants'

Journal

HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL
Volume 67, Issue 14, Pages 2211-2213

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2022.2128804

Keywords

interdisciplinary; social science; natural science; human-water systems; transdisciplinary; participatory; knowledge systems

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This reply explores two main aspects: the integration of data from the social and natural sciences, and the importance of transdisciplinary research. The authors agree and highlight the time-intensive learning, reflection, and participation processes for researchers, practitioners, and participants.
In this reply to Thaler, we take the opportunity to explore two main aspects of his piece to continue the discussion: (1) the integration of data from the social and natural sciences, and (2) the importance of transdisciplinary research. We agree, and highlight that necessary learning, reflections and participation processes are time-intensive for researchers, practitioners and participants. We believe that these discussion pieces are important for informing, engaging, and debating challenges and practices, providing continued opportunities to learn from one another, enabling new forms of research and collaborations to flourish.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available