4.7 Article

Seeing and extrapolating motion trajectories share common informative activation patterns in primary visual cortex

Journal

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages 1389-1406

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26123

Keywords

dynamic occlusion; fMRI; MVPA; retinotopic mapping; V1

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigates the neural basis of visible and occluded changes in motion direction using retinotopic maps and multivariate pattern analysis. The findings suggest that low-level visual areas play a role in mentally representing motion trajectory during occlusion.
The natural environment is dynamic and moving objects become constantly occluded, engaging the brain in a challenging completion process to estimate where and when the object might reappear. Although motion extrapolation is critical in daily life-imagine crossing the street while an approaching car is occluded by a larger standing vehicle-its neural underpinnings are still not well understood. While the engagement of low-level visual cortex during dynamic occlusion has been postulated, most of the previous group-level fMRI-studies failed to find evidence for an involvement of low-level visual areas during occlusion. In this fMRI-study, we therefore used individually defined retinotopic maps and multivariate pattern analysis to characterize the neural basis of visible and occluded changes in motion direction in humans. To this end, participants learned velocity-direction change pairings (slow motion-upwards; fast motion-downwards or vice versa) during a training phase without occlusion and judged the change in stimulus direction, based on its velocity, during a following test phase with occlusion. We find that occluded motion direction can be predicted from the activity patterns during visible motion within low-level visual areas, supporting the notion of a mental representation of motion trajectory in these regions during occlusion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available