4.6 Article

Radiotherapy prior to or after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a randomized controlled trial

Journal

HEPATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages 1368-1378

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12072-022-10423-7

Keywords

Hepatocellular carcinoma; Portal vein tumor thrombus; Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization; Radiotherapy; Sequential treatment

Funding

  1. Clinical Research Plan of Shanghai Shenkang Hospital Development Center [SHDC2020CR1004A]
  2. State Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [81730097]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of China [82102941, 82072618]
  4. San Hang Program of Navy Medical University
  5. Project of Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission [20Y11908800]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the outcomes of radiotherapy (RT) prior to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with TACE followed by RT in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). The results showed that RT + TACE group had better overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared to TACE + RT group, especially for patients with PVTT type III/IV. Therefore, applying RT prior to TACE may be a more effective treatment strategy for these patients.
Introduction To compare survival outcomes of radiotherapy (RT) prior to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) (RT + TACE) with TACE followed with RT (TACE + RT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). Methods A randomized controlled study was conducted from August 2016 to December 2019 on patients with unresectable HCC and PVTT. The patients were randomly assigned to RT + TACE group or TACE + RT group in a 1:1 ratio. Evaluation of therapeutic effects on the primary tumor was based on the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), while that on PVTT was based on the changing of Cheng's PVTT classification. The primary end-point was overall survival (OS). Results The 120 patients who entered this study were evenly assigned to two groups. In the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, the OS rates for RT + TACE group at 1, 2 and 3 years were 61.7%, 27.4% and 15.6%, compared with 45.0%, 16.1% and 4.7% in TACE + RT group. The median OS was increased in patients with RT + TACE compared with those who had TACE + RT with a marginally significance (15.4 versus 11.5 months, HR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.46-1.01, p = 0.054). The median progression-free survival (PFS) in RT + TACE group was 6.6 months versus 4.2 months in TACE + RT group (HR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.46-0.96, p = 0.030). The corresponding disease control rate (DCR) at 3 months was 86.7% versus 66.7% (p = 0.017) and 61.7% versus 46.7% (p = 0.099) at 6 months. In subgroup analyses, RT + TACE was associated with better OS (HR, 0.48; 95% CI 0.33-0.99, p = 0.048) and PFS (HR, 0.55; 95% CI 0.33-0.93, p = 0.026) versus TACE + RT among patients with type III/IV PVTT. There were 3 patients in RT + TACE group and 2 in TACE + RT group had adverse events >= grade 3. Conclusion Applying RT prior to TACE provided better survival outcomes than TACE followed by RT for patients with HCC and PVTT, which may act as an optimized regional modality to further improve local control rates (Trial registration: ChiCTR ChiCTR2000033573.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available