4.2 Article

Total atrial conduction time provides novel information in prediction for stroke in patients with sinus rhythm

Journal

HEART AND VESSELS
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages 543-550

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00380-022-02189-7

Keywords

Stroke; Atrial fibrillation; Echocardiography

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The total atrial conduction time (TACT) measured by echocardiography can predict the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) and stroke; adding TACT to the revised Framingham stroke risk profile (rFSRP) significantly improves the prediction of stroke incidence.
The total atrial conduction time (TACT) measured by echocardiography predicts the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to investigate whether adding the TACT to the revised Framingham stroke risk profile (rFSRP) improves the efficacy of predicting stroke incidence in patients without prior stroke or known AF. The TACT was measured in 376 consecutive patients > 18 years (58.5 +/- 16.3 years; 46% male) receiving echocardiography without any prior history of stroke or AF. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of ischemic stroke, and the secondary endpoint was any documentation of AF during the 2 years of follow-up. During the follow-up period, ischemic strokes occurred in 10 patients (2.65%), and AF in 22 patients (5.85%). The TACT was significantly longer in those who later had a stroke compared with those who did not (169.4 vs. 142.7 ms, p < 0.001). Both rFSRP and TACT predicted the risk for stroke incidence. The univariate model showed that the TACT was a predictor of ischemic stroke incidence (p < 0.001; hazard ratio of 1.94 for every 10 ms; 95% confidence interval, 1.49-2.54). The addition of TACT to rFSRP significantly improved the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.79 vs. 0.85, p = 0.001). Stroke risk prediction was significantly improved by the addition of TACT to rFSRP. The utility of the TACT should be further investigated in large-scale randomized clinical trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available