4.5 Article

Development of the remote 100 ml water swallow test versus clinical assessment in patients with head and neck cancer: Do they agree?

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hed.27194

Keywords

100 ml water swallow test; deglutition; dysphagia; head and neck cancer; swallowing efficiency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates that video-testing and self-testing are reliable methods of completing the 100 ml water swallow test in patients with head and neck cancer.
Background The 100 ml water swallow test (WST) is a validated swallow assessment used in head and neck cancer (HNC). We aimed to determine the level of agreement when completing the 100 ml WST via clinician-graded video-testing or patient self-testing compared to standard face-to-face assessment (FTF). Methods Convenience sampling from four UK centers. Inclusion criteria: patients with HNC treated with any modality prior to, or within 5 years of treatment. Participants were recruited to complete the 100 ml WST by video-testing or self-testing and compared with FTF. Results Sixty-three patients were recruited; 1 was unable to perform the task; 30 in video-testing; and 32 in self-testing. There was no difference in swallow capacity (p = 0.424) and volume (p = 0.363) for the video-testing or the self-testing swallow capacity (p = 0.777) and volume (p = 0.445). Conclusions This study demonstrates that video-testing and self-testing are reliable methods of completing the 100 ml WST for this sample of patients with HNC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available