☆ 4.6 Article

Underscreening, overscreening, and guideline-adherent cervical cancer screening in a national cohort

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2022)

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Assessment of US Preventive Services Task Force Guideline-Concordant Cervical Cancer Screening Rates and Reasons for Underscreening by Age, Race and Ethnicity, Sexual Orientation, Rurality, and Insurance, 2005 to 2019

Ryan Suk et al.

Summary: This cross-sectional study found that cervical cancer screening rates in the US, adhering to the guidelines set by the US Preventive Services Task Force, have decreased from 2005 to 2019. Lack of knowledge was reported as the biggest barrier to receiving timely screening. Campaigns addressing patient knowledge and provider communication may help improve screening rates, and cultural adaptation of interventions is needed to reduce existing disparities.

JAMA NETWORK OPEN (2022)

Add to Collection

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Clinical follow-up practices after cervical cancer screening by co-testing: A population-based study of adherence to US guideline recommendations

B. Rebecca Perkins et al.

Summary: This study examined the clinical management following abnormal cervical screening by co-testing in a diverse population-based setting. Guideline-adherent follow-up was found to be highest when both cytology and hrHPV tests were abnormal, while lower for discordant results. The study suggests that provider education and robust recall systems may improve adherence to appropriate follow-up after abnormal screening results.

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Impact of COVID-19 on Cervical Cancer Screening Rates Among Women Aged 21–65 Years in a Large Integrated Health Care System — Southern California, January 1–September 30, 2019, and January 1–September 30, 2020

Maureen J. Miller et al.

MMWR-MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Impact of screening between the ages of 60 and 64 on cumulative rates of cervical cancer to age 84y by screening history at ages 50 to 59: A population-based case-control study

Alejandra Castanon et al.

Summary: Cervical screening between ages 60-64 can reduce the risk of cervical cancer between ages 60-84, especially for those who did not have screening in their 50s. Screening every five years further lowers the risk of cancer.

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Overuse of Cervical Cancer Screening Tests Among Women With Average Risk in the United States From 2013 to 2014

Jason D. Wright et al.

Summary: This cohort study explored the frequency of overuse of cervical cancer screening tests among commercially insured women with average risk. The findings showed that repeat screening was common within 36 months, but less common in older women, women with medical comorbidities, those screened in 2014, and those screened with cotesting. However, overuse of testing was more common in the Northeastern US and in women with more frequent outpatient visits.

JAMA NETWORK OPEN (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Oncology

Trends in the use of cervical cancer screening tests in a large medical claims database, United States, 2013-2019

Jin Qin et al.

Summary: The study examined trends in cervical cancer screening test use among commercially insured women from 2013 to 2019. The results showed that changes in screening test use aligned with clinical guidelines, but many young women under 21 were inappropriately screened for cervical cancer.

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Oncology

Eligibility for cervical cancer screening exit: Comparison of a national and safety net cohort

Jacqueline M. Mills et al.

Summary: The study aimed to determine eligibility for discontinuation of cervical cancer screening, with findings indicating that the majority of women fail to meet the criteria for screening exit. Additional measures may be necessary to reduce preventable cervical cancers among women aged >65.

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Oncology

A population study of screening history and diagnostic outcomes of women with invasive cervical cancer

Vicki B. Benard et al.

Summary: This study examined screening and diagnostic practices of women in the United States five years prior to an invasive cervical cancer diagnosis. The results showed that 60% of women had not been screened, and among those with abnormal screening results, 67% had adequate follow-up care. Predictors of being screened included younger age, higher income, and having insurance, while predictors of adequate follow-up care included higher income. Women with stage 1 cervical cancer were more likely to have been screened and were younger in age.

CANCER MEDICINE (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Is the age of cervical cancer diagnosis changing over time?

Colette M. Gnade et al.

Summary: The study found that the age of diagnosis of cervical cancer has increased over time, but there was no significant change in the proportion of patients over 65 years old. Additionally, 19.0% of women diagnosed with cervical cancer over the age of 65 developed cancer despite appropriate screening.

JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Persistent Opioid Use After Hysterectomy in the United States, 2005-2015

Jessica C. Young et al.

OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2020)

Add to Collection

Article Oncology

Cervical cancer screening for individuals at average risk: 2020 guideline update from the American Cancer Society

Elizabeth T. H. Fontham et al.

CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS (2020)

Add to Collection

Article Geriatrics & Gerontology

Characteristics and Treatments of Patients Aged 65 Years or Over with Cervical Cancer

Shangdan Xie et al.

CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING (2020)

Add to Collection

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Risk Estimates Supporting the 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines

Didem Egemen et al.

JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE (2020)

Add to Collection

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines for Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests and Cancer Precursors

Rebecca B. Perkins et al.

JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE (2020)

Add to Collection

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Trends Over Time in Pap and Pap-HPV Cotesting for Cervical Cancer Screening

Kathy L. MacLaughlin et al.

JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH (2019)

Add to Collection

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Trends in patient procurement of postoperative opioids and route of hysterectomy in the United States from 2004 through 2014

Jennifer C. Thompson et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2018)

Add to Collection

Review Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

How confident can we be in the current guidelines for exiting cervical screening?

Patti E. Gravitt et al.

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2018)

Add to Collection

Article Oncology

Assessment of treatment factors and clinical outcomes in cervical cancer in older women compared to women under 65 years old

Elisabeth J. Diver et al.

JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY (2018)

Add to Collection

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Screening for Cervical Cancer US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

Susan J. Curry et al.

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2018)

Add to Collection

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Cervical Cancer Incidence Among Elderly Women in Massachusetts Compared With Younger Women

Sarah Feldman et al.

JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE (2018)

Add to Collection

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Excess Cost of Cervical Cancer Screening Beyond Recommended Screening Ages or After Hysterectomy in a Single Institution

Deanna Teoh et al.

JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE (2018)

Add to Collection

Article Oncology

Harms of cervical cancer screening in the United States and the Netherlands

Dik Habbema et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER (2017)

Add to Collection

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Cancer Screening Test Use — United States, 2015

Arica White et al.

MMWR-MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT (2017)

Add to Collection

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Socioeconomic and Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Cancer Mortality, Incidence, and Survival in the United States, 1950-2014: Over Six Decades of Changing Patterns and Widening Inequalities

Gopal K. Singh et al.

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH (2017)

Add to Collection

Article Oncology

Hysterectomy-Corrected Cervical Cancer Mortality Rates Reveal a Larger Racial Disparity in the United States

Anna L. Beavis et al.

CANCER (2017)

Add to Collection

Review Obstetrics & Gynecology

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of benefits and harms of cryotherapy, LEEP, and cold knife conization to treat cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

Nancy Santesso et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS (2016)

Add to Collection

Article Oncology

Impact of cervical screening on cervical cancer mortality: estimation using stage-specific results from a nested case-control study

Rebecca Landy et al.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER (2016)

Add to Collection

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Global epidemiology of hysterectomy: possible impact on gynecological cancer rates

Anne Hammer et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2015)

Add to Collection

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Adherence to the 2012 national cervical cancer screening guidelines: a pilot study

Deanna G. K. Teoh et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2015)

Add to Collection

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Using Medical Claims for Policy Effectiveness Surveillance: Reimbursement and Utilization of Abdomen/Pelvis Computed Tomography Scans

Michal Horny et al.

HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH (2015)

Add to Collection

Article Oncology

The association between cervical cancer screening and mortality from cervical cancer: A population based case-control study

Danielle Vicus et al.

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2014)

Add to Collection

Review Oncology

Gynecologic cancer disparities: A report from the Health Disparities Taskforce of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology

Yvonne Collins et al.

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2014)

Add to Collection

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Challenges in Cervical Cancer Prevention A Survey of U.S. Obstetrician-Gynecologists

Rebecca B. Perkins et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2013)

Add to Collection

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Primary care provider practices and beliefs related to cervical cancer screening with the HPV test in Federally Qualified Health Centers

K. B. Roland et al.

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2013)

Add to Collection

Article Pathology

American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology Screening Guidelines for the Prevention and Early Detection of Cervical Cancer

Debbie Saslow et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY (2012)

Add to Collection

Article Oncology

The psychosocial impact of an abnormal cervical smear result

Melanie Drolet et al.

PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY (2012)

Add to Collection

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure and the Risk for Preterm Birth

Maija Jakobsson et al.

OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2009)

Add to Collection

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Pathways to diagnosis of cervical cancer: screening history, delay in follow up, and smear reading

P. Priest et al.

BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2007)

Add to Collection

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Risk of cervical cancer associated with extending the interval between cervical-cancer screenings

GF Sawaya et al.

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2003)

Add to Collection

© Peeref 2019-2024. All rights reserved.