4.7 Article

Global Increases in Lethal Compound Heat Stress: Hydrological Drought Hazards Under Climate Change

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 49, Issue 18, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2022GL100880

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52009091]
  2. UKRI [MR/V022008/1]
  3. NERC [NE/S015728/1]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2042022kf1221]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous studies have not considered the role of humidity in heat-related extremes. This study presents the first global assessment of the projected changes in lethal heat stress-drought hazards, showing that atmospheric conditions and lower relative humidity play a crucial role in these compound hazards. The findings indicate a significant increase in the risks of compound lethal heat stress-drought hazards in the future due to increases in heat extremes.
Previous studies seldom consider humidity when examining heat-related extremes, and none have explored the effects of humidity on concurrent extremes of high heat stress and low river streamflow. Here, we present the first global picture of projected changes in compound lethal heat stress (T-h)-drought hazards (CHD) across 11,637 catchments. Our observational datasets show that atmospheric conditions (e.g., energy and vapor flux) play an important role in constraining the heat extremes, and that T-h (32% +/- 11%) yields a higher coincidence rate of global CHD than wet-bulb temperature (28% +/- 11%), driven by lower relative humidity (RH) and thus air dryness in T-h extremes. Our large model ensemble projects a 10-fold intensification of bivariate CHD risks by 2071-2100, mainly driven by increases in heat extremes. Future declines in RH, wind, snow, and precipitation in many regions are likely to exacerbate such water and weather-related hazards (e.g., drought and CHD).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available