4.7 Article

Subsurface Water Flux in California's Central Valley and Its Source Watershed From Space Geodesy

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 49, Issue 22, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2022GL099583

Keywords

Central Valley; groundwater; recharge; subsurface water; GPS; GRACE

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we estimate the changes in subsurface water in California using various data sources. The results show that a portion of precipitation infiltrates the subsurface but is later lost through evapotranspiration and lateral subsurface flow, with the majority of losses occurring in the southern region of the Central Valley. Additionally, the groundwater levels in the Central Valley fluctuate significantly on an annual basis. It is worth noting that a portion of the groundwater lost during recent severe droughts has been replenished during subsequent years of heavy rainfall.
We integrate Global Positioning System displacements, Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment gravity data, reservoir water volumes, and snowpack to estimate change in subsurface water in California. We find 29% of precipitation infiltrates mountain soil and fractured bedrock each autumn and winter and is lost in the spring and summer by evapotranspiration and lateral subsurface flow either within mountain watersheds or into California's Central Valley. The Central Valley lost groundwater at 2.2 +/- 0.7 km(3)/yr from 2006 to 2021, with 68% of the loss occurring in the southern third of the Valley. Water in Central Valley fluctuates each year by a mean of 10.7 +/- 1.1 km(3) with maximum water in April (not August). A third of Central Valley groundwater lost during recent severe drought is recharged during subsequent years of heavy precipitation. Of the 50 km(3) of water entering Central Valley each year, 28 km(3) comes from rivers, 17 km(3) from precipitation, and 5 km(3) from mountain groundwater.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available