4.5 Article

Viscoacoustic least-squares reverse-time migration of different-order free-surface multiples

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING
Volume 71, Issue 1, Pages 29-47

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2478.13274

Keywords

Different-order; least-squares reverse-time migration; multiples; Q-compensated

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a method to use multiples to image shadow zones of primaries. By deriving viscoacoustic Born modeling operators, adjoint operators, and demigration operators for different-order multiples, a Q-compensated reverse-time migration method is proposed. Example results show that this method can produce better imaging results.
Multiples have longer propagation paths and smaller reflection angles than primaries for the same source-receiver combination, so they cover a larger illumination area. Therefore, multiples can be used to image shadow zones of primaries. Least-squares reverse-time migration of multiples can produce high-quality images with fewer artefacts, high resolution and balanced amplitudes. However, viscoelasticity exists widely in the earth, especially in the deep-sea environment, and the influence of Q attenuation on multiples is much more serious than primaries due to multiples have longer paths. To compensate for Q attenuation of multiples, Q-compensated least-squares reverse-time migration of different-order multiples is proposed by deriving viscoacoustic Born modelling operators, adjoint operators and demigration operators for different-order multiples. Based on inversion theory, this method compensates for Q attenuation along all the propagation paths of multiples. Examples of a simple four-layer model, a modified attenuating Sigsbee2B model and a field data set suggest that the proposed method can produce better imaging results than Q-compensated least-squares reverse-time migration of primaries and regular least-squares reverse-time migration of multiples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available