4.7 Article

Formation, cooling history and age of impact events on the IIE iron parent body: Evidence from the Miles meteorite

Journal

GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 339, Issue -, Pages 157-172

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2022.10.034

Keywords

IIE iron meteorites; Silicate inclusions; Impact melting; Partial melting; Geochronology

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DP150104604, DP200100406, FT130101524]
  2. Australian Synchrotron [IA161/10908]
  3. DOE Office of Science User Facility [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  4. Advanced Light Source [ALS-07585]
  5. Australian Government Research Training Program
  6. RSES John Conrad Jaeger Scholarship
  7. NCRIS
  8. Australian Research Council [FT130101524, DP200100406] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By studying the Miles IIE iron meteorite, we found that the silicate inclusions in it were formed in a high-temperature melting event about 4.5 billion years ago, which is consistent with the ages of other similar meteorites. These findings suggest that the formation of silicate inclusions may be due to impact events.
Most iron meteorites formed in planetary cores during differentiation, but the IIE iron meteorites have chemical and physical features that are inconsistent with this origin. By combining mineral chemistry, mineral modes and three-dimensional petrography, we reconstruct the bulk chemistry of the felsic silicate-bearing Miles IIE iron meteorite and demonstrate that the silicate inclusion compositions are similar to partial melts produced experimentally from an H chondrite composition. We use the reconstructed bulk composition, mineralogy and thermodynamic modelling to show that melting above similar to 1200 degrees C under reducing conditions formed metal (Fe-Ni alloy) and felsic silicate partial melts. Upon cooling, the melts crystallized Mg-rich pyroxenes, Na- and K-rich feldspars, and tridymite. Importantly, this mechanism enriches cosmochemically volatile elements (i.e., those with a 50% condensation temperature of similar to 430-830 degrees C, like Na and K) to the level found in the felsic silicate inclusions. The presence of crystallographically disordered srilankite (only stable above 1160 degrees C) and an absence of Widmanstatten texture require both high peak temperatures and rapid cooling, which cannot be explained by core formation. Instead they point to small melt volumes, a transient heat pulse, and small thermal mass, and imply efficient physical segregation of silicate and metallic melts through buoyancy separation followed by rapid cooling that arrested the separation of metal and silicate liquid phases. In situ 207Pb/206Pb age of 4542.3 +/- 4.0 Ma in Zr-oxide and phosphate minerals dates the melting event that formed the silicate inclusions. This age aligns with the earliest ages found in other IIE iron meteorite silicates and requires a heating event similar to 25 million years after the solar system formed. We found 39Ar/40Ar ages of 3495 +/- 52 Ma (low-T) and 4303 +/- 7 Ma (high-T) in a K-feldspar grain, with the 3495 Ma age aligning with later thermal events recorded in other IIE iron meteorites. Dating reveals the complex petrogenetic and thermal history of Miles and the IIE iron meteorites. This is the first IIE iron meteorite found to record evidence of heating at 4.5 and 3.5 Ga likely from impact events. We propose that high-velocity impact(s) into an iron-rich, porous chondritic parent body at similar to 4.54 Ga produced immiscible metal and silicate melts that cooled rapidly and trapped low density silicate inclusions within high density metal. Other IIE irons that formed at lower peak temperatures (900-1000 degrees C) contain chondritic silicate inclusions and relict chondrules, supporting this conceptual model. This petrogenesis is consistent with thermodynamic modelling, experimental data and the wide range of peak temperatures and cooling rates observed in the IIE iron meteorites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available