4.7 Article

Telecytology versus in-room cytopathologist for EUS-guided FNA or fine-needle biopsy sampling of solid pancreatic lesions

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy With or Without Rapid On-site Evaluation for Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial

Stefano Francesco Crino et al.

Summary: The study found that in evaluating solid pancreatic lesions, EUS-FNB without ROSE can achieve high diagnostic accuracy. EUS-FNB without ROSE showed higher tissue core rate and shorter sampling time. Therefore, when using new-generation FNB needles, ROSE should not be routinely recommended.

GASTROENTEROLOGY (2021)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) with EUS-FNA: The ROSE looks beautiful

Fei Yang et al.

ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND (2019)

Article Oncology

A Superior Method for Cell Block Preparation for Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsies

Ronald Balassanian et al.

CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY (2016)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Rapid on-site evaluation of endoscopic-ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration diagnosis of pancreatic masses

Julio Iglesias-Garcia et al.

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY (2014)

Article Oncology

Role of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer

Juana Gonzalo-Marin et al.

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY (2014)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Dynamic Telecytology Compares Favorably to Rapid Onsite Evaluation of Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine Needle Aspirates

James L. Buxbaum et al.

DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES (2012)

Editorial Material Gastroenterology & Hepatology

EUS-guided FNA: better samples with smaller needles?

Henning Gerke

GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY (2009)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Assessment of complications of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration

D O'Toole et al.

GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY (2001)