4.7 Article

Multiple injection strategies with high water port injection rates for enhancing performance and emissions in a boosted SI engine

Journal

FUEL
Volume 326, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124982

Keywords

Water injection; Split injection; Thermal efficiency; Particulate matter reduction; NOx reduction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Water injection has been proven to be effective in reducing nitrogen oxide emissions and improving fuel conversion efficiency in turbocharged spark ignition engines. However, it also leads to increased particulate matter and unburned hydrocarbon emissions. This study utilized multiple fuel injection strategies to solve these problems and found that the drawbacks of water injection were significantly improved. The relative thermal efficiency improvement and nitrogen oxide emission reduction were maximized with the combined injection strategy.
Water injection has been proven both to reduce emissions of nitrogen oxides and to improve fuel conversion efficiency via knock limit extension in turbocharged spark ignition (SI) engines. However, water injection still has several obstacles to maximize the benefits, such as an increase of particulate matter and unburned hydrocarbon emissions. In order to ameliorate the problems with a sufficient amount of water injection (water to fuel mass ratio > 0.5), this study adopted multiple fuel injection strategies, which inject fuel multiple times in a cycle. A boosted single-cylinder research engine equipped with a water port injector and a piezoelectric gasoline direct injector was utilized for this study over a range of water to fuel mass ratio (up to 1.0) and multiple fuel injection (single vs. triple) conditions. The results show that the drawbacks of water injection including combustion instability, unburned hydrocarbon, and particulate emissions were significantly improved with multiple fuel injections, and the relative thermal efficiency improvement and nitrogen oxide emission reduction were maximized up to 3.9% and 52.7%, respectively, with the combined injection strategy. In addition, the increased carbon monoxide emissions typical with multiple fuel injections were largely mitigated by the water injection strategy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available