4.7 Article

Optimization of biogenic sulfur flocculation from an anoxic desulfurization bioreactor using response surface methodology

Journal

FUEL
Volume 323, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124367

Keywords

Biogenic sulfur; Flocculation; Optimization; Response surface methodology; Turbidity

Funding

  1. ERDF Operational Programme [FEDER-UCA18-106138]
  2. Department of Economy, Knowledge, Business
  3. University of the Regional Government of Andalusia [2014-2020 ERDF]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the flocculation of biogenic sulfur produced in the anoxic bioreactor for biogas desulfurization, with cationic flocculants showing the highest efficiency. The optimal flocculation conditions were observed using Lizaflock 853 M at a dose of 0.82 mg L-1, a stirring speed of 30 rpm, and a pH of 8.0.
Elemental sulfur is an interesting byproduct obtained in the anoxic biodesulfurization of biogas. However, the colloidal properties of this biogenic elemental sulfur (S-0) make its efficient recovery difficult. The present study investigated the flocculation of S-0 produced in an anoxic bioreactor for biogas desulfurization using cationic (Sedifloc 40L4 C, Lizaflock 853 M), anionic (Innoflock 201) and non-ionic flocculants (NI-1009) and a coagulant (polyaluminum chloride). Cationic-type flocculants showed the highest flocculation efficiency, which led to its selection for further evaluation using the response surface methodology of the effects and interactions of its dose, stirring speed and pH on the biogenic sulfur flocculation rate. Optimum S-0 flocculation conditions were observed using Lizaflock 853 M at a dose of 0.82 mg L-1, a stirring speed of 30 rpm and a pH of 8.0. A S-0 flocculation rate of 97.05% was achieved for an initial concentration of 1730 mg S-0 L-1. The Zeta potential of the settled sulfur particles increased after the flocculation process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available