4.7 Review

Linking evolutionary potential to extinction risk: applications and future directions

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Volume 20, Issue 9, Pages 507-515

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/fee.2552

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. David H Smith Conservation Research Fellowship
  2. US National Science Foundation [DEB 1838282]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extinction-risk assessments are crucial for prioritizing conservation action, but quantifying extinction risk, especially incorporating evolutionary potential, is challenging. Disregarding evolutionary potential can lead to inadequate resource allocation and recovery planning. Fortunately, proxies for evolutionary potential can be estimated from environmental, phenotypic, and genetic data.
Extinction-risk assessments play a major role in prioritizing conservation action at national and international levels. However, quantifying extinction risk is challenging, especially when including the full suite of adaptive responses to environmental change. In particular, evolutionary potential (EP) - the capacity to evolve genetically based changes that increase fitness under changing conditions - has proven difficult to evaluate, limiting its inclusion in risk assessments. Theory, experiments, simulations, and field studies all highlight the importance of EP in characterizing and mitigating extinction risk. Disregarding EP can therefore result in ineffective allocation of resources and inadequate recovery planning. Fortunately, proxies for EP can be estimated from environmental, phenotypic, and genetic data. Some proxies can be incorporated into quantitative extinction-risk assessments, whereas others better inform basic conservation actions that maximize resilience to future change. Integration of EP into conservation decision making is challenging but essential and remains an important issue for innovation in applied conservation science. Front Ecol Environ 2022;

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available