4.5 Article

Assessment of bio-ionic liquids as promising solvents in industrial separation processes: Computational screening using COSMO-RS method

Journal

FLUID PHASE EQUILIBRIA
Volume 560, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2022.113495

Keywords

Bio-ionic liquids; Industrial separation; Liquid-liquid extraction; Absorption; COSMO

Funding

  1. Comunidad de Madrid [SUSTEC P2018/EMT-4348]
  2. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad of Spain [CTQ2017-89441-R]
  3. Ministerio Universidades [CA1/RSUE/2021-00585]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biocompatible ionic liquids (bio-ILs) have emerged as a sustainable alternative for greener solvents in the chemical industry, with bio-ILs based on choline showing promising applications in gas absorption and liquid-liquid extraction processes.
The use of organic solvents in the chemical industry for gas-liquid absorption or liquid-liquid extraction operations is still unavoidable. The search of greener solvents to replace fossil-based counterparts is a challenge for the scientific community. Biocompatible ionic liquids (bio-ILs) emerged as a sustainable approach for the development of greener processes. In this work, bio-ILs based on choline as common cation are evaluated as promising solvents in typical industrial separation processes such as gas absorption (refrigerants, CO2, H2S, NH3, or acetone) and liquid-liquid extraction (hydrocarbon separations, denitrogenation, desulfurization, and recovery of value-added compounds and/or contaminants from aqueous streams) by means of COSMO-RS method. Some bio-ILs show competitive behavior compared to the benchmark common ILs solvents for all the solutes evaluated. None of the solvents evaluated is predicted to form two liquid phases in aqueous solutions, so future work should be conducted on finding hydrophobic bio-ILs to perform these separations. On the other hand, bio-ILs in hydrocarbon separations by means of liquid-liquid extraction show competitive results in terms of selectivities (benzoate-based) and partition coefficients (bicarbonate-based) compared to benchmark sulfolane and common ILs previously tested. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available