4.8 Article

Mesoporous Carbon Nanocube Architecture for High-Performance Lithium-Oxygen Batteries

Journal

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
Volume 25, Issue 28, Pages 4436-4444

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201500863

Keywords

cathode catalysts; lithium-oxygen batteries; mesoporous carbon nanocubes; ruthenium nanocrystals

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) through the ARC FT project [FT110100800]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [NE2014301]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One of the major challenges to develop high-performance lithium-oxygen (Li-O-2) battery is to find effective cathode catalysts and design porous architecture for the promotion of both oxygen reduction reactions and oxygen evolution reactions. Herein, the synthesis of mesoporous carbon nanocubes as a new cathode nanoarchitecture for Li-O-2 batteries is reported. The oxygen electrodes made of mesoporous carbon nanocubes contain numerously hierarchical mesopores and macropores, which can facilitate oxygen diffusion and electrolyte impregnation throughout the electrode, and provide sufficient spaces to accommodate insoluble discharge products. When they are applied as cathode catalysts, the Li-O-2 cells deliver discharge capacities of 26 100 mA h g(-1) at 200 mA g(-1), which is much higher than that of commercial carbon black catalysts. Furthermore, the mesoporous nanocube architecture can also serve as a conductive host structure for other highly efficient catalysts. For instance, the Ru functionalized mesoporous carbon nanocubes show excellent catalytic activities toward oxygen evolution reactions. Li-O-2 batteries with Ru functionalized mesoporous carbon nanocube catalysts demonstrate a high charge/discharge electrical energy efficiency of 86.2% at 200 mA g(-1) under voltage limitation and a good cycling performance up to 120 cycles at 400 mA g(-1) with the curtaining capacity of 1000 mA h g(-1).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available