4.6 Article

Hyperpigmented epiretinal membrane in macular telangiectasia type 2: imaging characteristics and correlation with transretinal pigment migration

Journal

EYE
Volume 37, Issue 9, Pages 1856-1860

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-022-02260-7

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hyperpigmented epiretinal membranes (ERMs) can occur in late-stage MacTel type 2 following full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) or transretinal migration of pigmented cells. Once on the retinal surface, black pigment cells seem to proliferate towards superficial retinal veins.
Objectives To explore the features of black hyperpigmentation in macular telangiectasia (MacTel) type 2 and correlate these findings with the characteristics of hyperpigmented epiretinal membranes (ERMs) using multimodal imaging. Methods A case series of three patients with MacTel type 2 and hyperpigmented ERMs imaged with colour fundus photography, fluorescein angiography (FA), spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) and swept-source OCT angiography. Registration of different types of imaging was done using ImageJ v1.53f51 (National Institutes of Health, USA). Results Three female patients with late-stage MacTel type 2 presented with unilateral hyperpigmented ERMs in the absence of peripheral retinal breaks. In one patient, an extensive ERM occurred along with a full-thickness macular hole (FTMH); in 2 patients, smaller ERMs were seen adjacent to superficial retinal veins. Serial imaging demonstrated that transretinal pigment migration preceded epiretinal proliferation of the hyperpigmented ERM towards superficial retinal veins. Conclusion Hyperpigmented ERMs may occur in the late phases of MacTel type 2 following a FTMH or transretinal migration of pigmented cells to the retinal surface. Once on the retinal surface, black pigment cells seem to proliferate centripetally toward superficial retinal veins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available