4.7 Article

Assessing shoring strategies based on efficiency

Journal

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
Volume 207, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118032

Keywords

Chance -constrained data envelopment analysis; Data envelopment analysis; Malmquist productivity index; Shoring strategy; Supplier evaluation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article proposes a supplier evaluation model based on data envelopment analysis (DEA), which can effectively measure and evaluate supplier performance, considering uncertainty factors and performance changes. The model is of great significance in both theoretical and practical aspects.
With globalization, companies are increasingly employing offshoring strategies or establishing subsidiaries with external partners in foreign countries. However, many companies have difficulty strategizing because of increasing complexity of corporate activity and environmental uncertainty. On the supply side, it implies that it is difficult to assess a supplier's performance. Eventually, offshoring has caused undesirable outcomes for a firm's business. We provide a quantitative supplier evaluation model based on data envelopment analysis (DEA). The model includes two different variant of DEA models. malmquist productivity index (MPI) is used to determine whether objects are performing well over time and uncertain factors are considered stochastically by employing chance-constrained data envelopment analysis (CCDEA). By analyzing a numerical example, the suggested model demonstrates consistent results indicating whether subsidiary performance has improved or not. In addition, coherent outcomes are observed in two different return-to-scale suppositions, except that a subsidiary performance has changed significantly. In theoretical respect, this is the first attempt to combine the two DEA variations. Practically, the model's analysis reflects stochastic data and measures time series changes in performance so that it can provide more useful information for practitioners.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available