4.2 Article

Fedratinib: a pharmacotherapeutic option for JAK-inhibitor naive and exposed patients with myelofibrosis

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY
Volume 23, Issue 15, Pages 1677-1686

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2022.2135989

Keywords

Myelofibrosis; myeloproliferative neoplasm; fedratinib; JAK inhibitor; symptoms

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ruxolitinib is commonly used for MF patients, but its response durability is limited. Long-term data for fedratinib and pacritinib are not available. This review examines the data, outlines the role of fedratinib in MF treatment, and highlights the knowledge gaps for optimizing its use.
Introduction Ruxolitinib is the most commonly used JAK-inhibitor (JAKi) for the management of symptoms related to splenomegaly and cytokine-mediated inflammation in patients with myelofibrosis (MF), but is limited by variable durability of response with most patients experiencing failure after 2-3 years. Long-term data on other approved JAKi, fedratinib and pacritinib, are not available due to the clinical hold put on pivotal trials for toxicity concerns. Areas covered Following the initial hold for concern of Wernicke's encephalopathy, fedratinib was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2019 for MF. We review the data available from early, and late phase critical trials, outline a role for fedratinib in the current treatment landscape of MF, and highlight the knowledge gaps in optimizing use of fedratinib. Expert opinion The JAKARTA and JAKARTA2 trials established efficacy in spleen volume response (SVR) and symptom reduction in JAKi-naive and ruxolitinib-exposed MF patients, respectively. Further trials, FREEDOM and FREEDOM2, are in progress to understand long-term effects of fedratinib; and include strategies to mitigate gastrointestinal toxicity, monitor thiamine levels and surveil for encephalopathy. We use fedratinib for symptomatic MF following ruxolitinib failure in patients without significant cytopenias; with practical strategies for monitoring and managing potential toxicity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available