4.5 Article

Clinical decision-making style preferences of European psychiatrists: Results from the Ambassadors survey in 38 countries

Journal

EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2330

Keywords

Clinical decision-making; Europe; mental health; professional-patient relations; psychiatry; shared decision-making

Categories

Funding

  1. European Psychiatry Association (EPA)
  2. NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that European psychiatrists prefer shared clinical decision-making style, with significant differences in non-SDM decision-making styles. The importance of dialogue and educational efforts to harmonize clinical practice across Europe was emphasized.
Background While shared clinical decision-making (SDM) is the preferred approach to decision-making in mental health care, its implementation in everyday clinical practice is still insufficient. The European Psychiatric Association undertook a study aiming to gather data on the clinical decision-making style preferences of psychiatrists working in Europe. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional online survey involving a sample of 751 psychiatrists and psychiatry specialist trainees from 38 European countries in 2021, using the Clinical Decision-Making Style - Staff questionnaire and a set of questions regarding clinicians' expertise, training, and practice. Results SDM was the preferred decision-making style across all European regions ([central and eastern Europe, CEE], northern and western Europe [NWE], and southern Europe [SE]), with an average of 73% of clinical decisions being rated as SDM. However, we found significant differences in non-SDM decision-making styles: participants working in NWE countries more often prefer shared and active decision-making styles rather than passive styles when compared to other European regions, especially to the CEE. Additionally, psychiatry specialist trainees (compared to psychiatrists), those working mainly with outpatients (compared to those working mainly with inpatients) and those working in community mental health services/public services (compared to mixed and private settings) have a significantly lower preference for passive decision-making style. Conclusions The preferences for SDM styles among European psychiatrists are generally similar. However, the identified differences in the preferences for non-SDM styles across the regions call for more dialogue and educational efforts to harmonize practice across Europe.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available