4.5 Article

53BP1 suppresses epithelial-mesenchymal transition by downregulating ZEB1 through microRNA-200b/429 in breast cancer

Journal

CANCER SCIENCE
Volume 106, Issue 8, Pages 982-989

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cas.12699

Keywords

53BP1; breast cancer; epithelial-mesenchymal transition; microRNA; ZEB1

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81172529, 81272903]
  2. Shandong Science and Technology Development Plan [2013GRC31801]
  3. Foundation for Outstanding Young Scientists in Shandong Province [2014BSE27026]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is an important mechanism of cancer invasion and metastasis. Although p53 binding protein 1 (53BP1) has been implicated in several biological processes, its function in EMT of human cancers has not yet been reported. Here, we show that 53BP1 negatively regulated EMT by modulating ZEB1 through targeting microRNA (miR)-200b and miR-429. Furthermore, 53BP1 promoted ZEB1-mediated upregulation of E-cadherin and also inhibited the expressions of mesenchymal markers, leading to increased migration and invasion in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. Consistently, in MCF-7 breast cancer cells, low 53BP1 expression reduced E-cadherin expression, resulting in increased migration and invasion. These effects were reversed by miR-200b and miR-429 inhibition or overexpression. Sections of tumor xenograft model showed increased ZEB1 expression and decreased E-cadherin expression with the downregulation of 53BP1. In 18 clinical tissue samples, expression of 53BP1 was positively correlated with miR-200b and mir-429 and negatively correlated with ZEB1. It was also found that 53BP1 was associated with lymph node metastasis. Taken together, these results suggest that 53BP1 functioned as a tumor suppressor gene by its novel negative control of EMT through regulating the expression of miR-200b/429 and their target gene ZEB1.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available