4.5 Article

Price minimizing behaviours by smokers in Europe (2006-20): evidence from the International Tobacco Control Project

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages 905-912

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac115

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US National Cancer Institute [R01 CA100362, R01 P50 CA111236, P01 CA138389, P01 CA200512]
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP-57897, MOP-79551, MOP-115016, FDN-148477]
  3. Cancer Research UK [C312/A3726, C312/A6465, C321/A11039, C25586/A19540]
  4. German Federal Ministry of Health, Dieter Mennekes-Umweltstiftung
  5. German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)
  6. European Union [681109]
  7. University of Waterloo
  8. Observatoire francais des drogues et toxicomanies (OFDT) [06/2d0708/191-2-LL]
  9. Institut national de prevention et d'education pour la sante (INPES)
  10. Institut nationale du cancer (INCa)
  11. Sante publique France
  12. Canadian Institutes of Health Research Foundation Grant [FDN-148477]
  13. Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development [ZonMw 70000001, 121010008, ZonMw 200130002]
  14. SILNE Project (European Commission) [FP7 HEALTH-F3-2011-278273]
  15. Dutch Cancer Foundation (KWF) [UM 2014-7210]
  16. Longfonds (Lung Foundation Netherlands)
  17. Hartstichting (Netherlands Heart Foundation)
  18. KWF Kankerbestrijding (Dutch Cancer Society)
  19. Trombosestichting Nederland (Thrombosis Foundation)
  20. Diabetesfonds (Diabetes Fund) [2.1.19.004]
  21. Canadian Cancer Society O. Harold Warwick Prize
  22. Marga and Walter Boll Foundation, Kerpen
  23. Ontario Institute for Cancer Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzes trends and factors associated with smokers' price-minimizing behaviors in four European countries from 2006 to 2020. Buying cheaper tobacco is the most common strategy, but there are differences in trends and magnitudes among countries and behaviors.
Background Effectiveness of tobacco taxation can be undermined through smokers applying price-minimizing behaviours rather than quitting or reducing consumption. Common price-minimizing strategies are buying cheaper tobacco [discount brands or roll-your-own (RYO) tobacco], bulk buying and cross-border purchasing. This study analyses trends in and factors associated with such behaviours in four European countries from 2006 to 2020. Methods Data came from adult smokers participating in the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Surveys conducted between 2006 and 2020 in England (9 waves, n = 768-4149), France (4 waves, n = 1415-1735), Germany (5 waves, n = 513-1515) and the Netherlands (10 waves, n = 1191-2177). Country-specific generalized estimating equation regression models were fit to assess trends in smoking RYO tobacco, discount brands, bulk buying and cross-border purchasing within the European Union. Results Buying discount brands or RYO tobacco was the most common strategy in all countries, except France. Except for buying discount brands, estimates of price-minimizing behaviours were highest in France (2019: RYO = 27.2%, discount brands = 17.3%, bulk buying = 34.1%, cross-border purchasing = 34.2%), and lowest in Germany (2018: RYO = 18.6%, discount brands = 43.7%, bulk buying = 8.0%, cross-border purchasing = 9.8%). Direction and magnitude of trends differed by country, and behaviour. Young smokers were less likely to buy in bulk. Low-income and low-education smokers were more likely to purchase RYO tobacco or discount brands. The association with discount brands was not found for French low-income smokers. Conclusions Smoking cheaper tobacco is the most prevalent price-minimizing strategy in three countries (England, Germany and Netherlands), and more prevalent among low-income individuals. Harmonizing prices across products and countries would reduce switching to cheaper tobacco.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available