4.5 Review

Exploiting the molecular diversity of the synapse to investigate neuronal communication: A guide through the current toolkit

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 56, Issue 12, Pages 6141-6161

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15848

Keywords

endo-exocytosis; genetically encoded; indicator; optogenetics; synaptic transmission

Categories

Funding

  1. BIBLIOSAN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reviews custom methods for evaluating and modifying synaptic activity, discussing their advantages, limitations, and applications in vitro and in vivo studies. The article also discusses challenges in extending these methods to the in vivo setting and the potential of using optogenetic approaches to manipulate synaptic function in the living brain.
Chemical synapses are tiny and overcrowded environments, deeply embedded inside brain tissue and enriched with thousands of protein species. Many efforts have been devoted to developing custom approaches for evaluating and modifying synaptic activity. Most of these methods are based on the engineering of one or more synaptic protein scaffolds used to target active moieties to the synaptic compartment or to manipulate synaptic functioning. In this review, we summarize the most recent methodological advances and provide a description of the involved proteins as well as the operation principle. Furthermore, we highlight their advantages and limitations in relation to studies of synaptic transmission in vitro and in vivo. Concerning the labelling methods, the most important challenge is how to extend the available approaches to the in vivo setting. On the other hand, for those methods that allow manipulation of synaptic function, this limit has been overcome using optogenetic approaches that can be more easily applied to the living brain. Finally, future applications of these methods to neuroscience, as well as new potential routes for development, are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available