4.5 Article

Molecular analysis of OXA-48-producing Escherichia coli in Switzerland from 2019 to 2020

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10096-022-04493-6

Keywords

Escherichia coli; OXA-48; Carbapenemase; Plasmid; Epidemiology

Funding

  1. University of Fribourg
  2. Swiss National Reference Center for Emerging Antibiotic Resistance
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation [FNS-31003A_163432]
  4. Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office FSVO Whole-genome-sequencing of cephalosporinase-and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae from animals: a baseline for a One-Health molecular epidemiology [1.21.07]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OXA-48-type β-lactamases are the most common carbapenemase-type in Enterobacterales in Switzerland, mainly found in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Bacteria producing OXA-48-type enzymes are endemic in certain regions, including Europe and North Africa, and frequently cause hospital-acquired infections. Despite the emergence of multiple OXA-48-type variants, the original variant, OXA-48, remains the most prevalent in E. coli. This study describes the epidemiology of OXA-48-producing E. coli isolates submitted to the Swiss National Reference Center for Emerging Antibiotic Resistance (NARA) between January 2019 and December 2020.
OXA-48-type ss-lactamases are the most prevalent carbapenemase-type in Enterobacterales in Switzerland, predominantly found in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Bacteria-producing OXA-48-type enzymes are endemic in some parts of the world, including Europe and North Africa, and are a frequent cause of nosocomial infections. Despite the emergence of numerous OXA-48-type variants, the original variant, OXA-48, remains the most prevalent in E. coli. This study describes the epidemiology of OXA-48-producing E. coli isolates submitted to the Swiss National Reference Center for Emerging Antibiotic Resistance (NARA) between January 2019 and December 2020.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available