4.6 Review

An umbrella review and meta-analysis of renin-angiotensin system drugs use and COVID-19 outcomes

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/eci.13888

Keywords

angiotensin receptor II blockers (ARBs); angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs); COVID-19; renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors; umbrella review

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite controversy, the collective evidence from observational studies supports a significant association between ACEI/ARB use and a reduction in death and death/ICU admission in COVID-19 patients. However, the evidence for reducing severe COVID-19 and increasing hospitalization is of poor quality. It is recommended to continue ACEI/ARB therapy in patients with COVID-19.
Background Despite the availability of extensive literature on the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) on COVID-19 outcomes, the evidence is still controversial. We aimed to provide a comprehensive assessment of the effect of ACEIs/ARBs on COVID-19-related outcomes by summarising the currently available evidence. Methods An umbrella review was conducted using Medline (OVID), Embase, Scopus, Cochrane library and medRxiv from inception to 1 February 2021. Systematic reviews with meta-analysis that evaluated the effect of ACEIs/ARBs on COVID-19-related clinical outcomes were eligible. Studies' quality was appraised using the AMSTAR 2 Critical Appraisal Tool. Data were analysed using the random-effects modelling including several subgroup analyses. Heterogenicity was assessed using I-2 statistic. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021233398) and reported using PRISMA guidelines. Results Overall, 47 reviews were eligible for inclusion. Out of the nine COVID-19 outcomes evaluated, there was significant associations between ACEIs/ARBs use and each of death (OR = 0.80, 95%CI = 0.75-0.86; I-2 = 51.9%), death/ICU admission as composite outcome (OR = 0.86, 95%CI = 0.80-0.92; I-2 = 43.9%), severe COVID-19 (OR = 0.86, 95%CI = 0.78-0.95; I-2 = 68%) and hospitalisation (OR = 1.23, 95%CI = 1.04-1.46; I-2 = 76.4%). The significant reduction in death/ICU admission, however, was higher among studies which presented adjusted measure of effects (OR = 0.63, 95%CI = 0.47-0.84) and were of moderate quality (OR = 0.74, 95%CI = 0.63-0.85). Conclusions Collective evidence from observational studies indicate a good quality evidence on the significant association between ACEIs/ARBs use and reduction in death and death/ICU admission, but poor-quality evidence on both reducing severe COVID-19 and increasing hospitalisation. Our findings further support the current recommendations of not discontinuing ACEIs/ARBs therapy in patients with COVID-19.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available