4.4 Article

A new efficient and integrated pathway for patient evaluation prior to atrial fibrillation ablation

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages 498-505

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvac095

Keywords

Atrial fibrillation; Catheter ablation; Pathway optimization; Lean Six Sigma; Care pathway; Research integration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The quality improvement project optimized a care pathway for AF ablation patients using Lean Six Sigma approach, leading to improved efficiency in patient evaluation, reduced hospital visits and consultations, and increased pathway compliance and data integrity.
Aims In this quality improvement project, a care pathway for patients considered for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation was optimized with the goals to improve the patient journey and simultaneously integrate prospective data collection into the clinical process. Methods and results The Lean Six Sigma approach was used to map the pre-existing process, identify constraints, and formulate countermeasures. The percentage of patients going through the full pre-ablation preparation that eventually underwent AF ablation, number of hospital visits and consultations, pathway compliance, and completeness of scientific data were measured before and after pathway optimization. Constraints in the process were (i) lack of standardized processes, (ii) inefficient use of resources, (iii) lack of multidisciplinary integration, (iv) lack of research integration, and (v) suboptimal communication. The impact of the corresponding countermeasures (defining a uniform process, incorporating 'go/no-go' moment, introducing a 'one-stop-shop', integrating prospective data collection, and improving communication) was studied for 33 patients before and 26 patients after pathway optimization. After optimization, the percentage of patients receiving a full pre-ablation preparation that eventually underwent AF ablation increased from 59% to 94% (P < 0.01). Fewer hospital visits (3.2 +/- 1.2 vs. 2.3 +/- 0.8, P = 0.01) and electrophysiologist consultations (1.8 +/- 0.7 vs. 1.0 +/- 0.3, P < 0.01) were required after pathway optimization. Pathway compliance and complete collection of scientific data increased significantly (3% vs. 73%, P < 0.01 and 15% vs. 73%, P < 0.01, respectively). Conclusion The optimization project resulted in a more efficient evaluation of patients considered for AF ablation. The new more efficient process includes prospective data collection and facilitates easy conduct of research studies focused on improvements of patient outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available