4.7 Article

Experimental investigation on the effects of DPF Cs-V-based non-precious metal catalysts and their coating forms on non-road diesel engine emission characteristics

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages 9401-9415

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-22656-y

Keywords

Emission characteristics; Non-road diesel engine; DPF; Non-precious metal catalysts; On-wall coating; In-wall coating

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the effects of non-precious metal catalysts supported by Cs-V and conventional Pt-Pd-based catalysts on the performance of a non-road diesel engine equipped with a diesel particulate filter (DPF). The results showed that the Cs-V-based catalysts slightly reduced particulate emissions and met the non-road China IV limits, while also oxidizing CO, HC, and NO to some extent. In-wall coating of the DPF caused higher gaseous and particulate emissions, negatively affecting engine performance.
Non-precious metal catalysts with good soot catalytic properties and a low cost have great potential for application in diesel particulate filters (DPF). In this study, we compared the effects of DPF supported by Cs2V4O11 (Cs-V-based) non-precious metal catalysts and conventional Pt-Pd-based precious metal catalysts on the performance of a non-road diesel engine. Furthermore, the effects of on-wall coating and in-wall coating of Cs-V-based catalysts on DPF performance were also investigated. The results indicated that the particulate emissions from DPF with Cs-V-based catalysts were reduced slightly less than that with Pt-Pd-based catalysts; however, the particle number (PN) and particulate matter (PM) emissions were still reduced by 94.4% and 91.7%, respectively, meeting the non-road China IV limits under the non-road steady cycle (NRSC). In addition, CO, HC, and NO can also be slightly oxidized by the non-precious metal catalysts. On the other hand, the DPF with in-wall coating induced comparatively higher gaseous substances and particulate emissions and caused a higher exhaust back pressure (EBP), which was 9.6% higher than the on-wall coating under NRSC, negatively affecting engine performance. Additionally, the geometric mean diameter (GMD) for the DPF with in-wall coating was only 33.3 nm because of the large emission proportion of nuclear mode particles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available