4.7 Article

The combined effect between BDNF genetic polymorphisms and exposure to metals on the risk of Chinese dyslexia

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
Volume 308, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119640

Keywords

Dyslexia; Metals; BDNF; Interaction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found an association between the BDNF gene rs6265 polymorphism and the risk of dyslexia, and that copper exposure could interact with rs6265 to increase the risk of dyslexia.
BDNF gene has been implicated in the development of cognition and language. Meanwhile, exposure to metals might interact with BDNF gene to increase the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders. The present study aimed to explore the association between BDNF genetic polymorphisms and dyslexic risk and examine whether BDNF polymorphisms would interact with metal exposures, jointly contributing to dyslexia. Among a case-control study composed of 238 children with dyslexia and 228 healthy controls, the BDNF genetic polymorphisms were genotyped by the Sequenom MassARRAY system, and the exposure to eight metals, such as lead (Pb), mercury (Hg) and copper (Cu), were measured using an inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometer (ICP-MS). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of dyslexia. After multivariate adjustment, significant associations of dyslexic risk with rs6265 polymorphisms of the BDNF gene were observed (OR = 1.99; 95% CI: 1.15-3.44). Furthermore, exposure to Cu could interact with rs6265 to increase the risk of dyslexia (P interaction = 0.045). High-Cu children with the rs6265 TT genotype were more likely to have dyslexia compared with low-Cu children carrying CC + CT genotypes (OR = 3.19; 95% CI: 1.38-7.39). The findings of this study suggested that the polymorphism of rs6265 in BDNF gene could interact with Cu exposure to increase the occurrence of dyslexia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available