4.5 Article

Spatial ensemble modeling for predicting the potential distribution of Lymantria dispar asiatica (Lepidoptera: Erebidae: Lymantriinae) in South Korea

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT
Volume 194, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-022-10609-4

Keywords

Climate change; CLIMEX; Ensemble modeling; Spongy moth; MaxEnt; Spatial distribution

Funding

  1. Investigation of larval occurrence characteristics of gypsy moths [FE0702-2021-01-2021]
  2. National Institute of Forest Science in Korea

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, species distribution models were used to predict the potential distribution of the spongy moth and identify areas at risk. The results showed that the number of suitable areas for the pest would decrease under climate change, providing important data for predicting areas in need of intensive control and monitoring in advance.
The spongy moth, Lymantria dispar, is a pest that damages various tree species throughout North America and Eurasia, has recently emerged in South Korea, threatening local forests and landscapes. The establishment of effective countermeasures against this species' outbreak requires predicting its potential distribution with climate change. In this study, we used species distribution models (CLIMEX and MaxEnt) to predict the potential distribution of the spongy moth and identify areas at risk of exposure to a sustained occurrence of the pest by constructing an ensemble map that simultaneously projected the outcomes of the two models. The results showed that the spongy moth could be distributed over the entire country under the current climate, but the number of suitable areas would decrease under a climate change scenario. This study is expected to provide basic data that can predict areas requiring intensive control and monitoring in advance with methodologically improved modeling technique.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available