4.7 Article

Seismic performance of concrete-encased column connections for concrete filled thin-walled steel tube piers

Journal

ENGINEERING STRUCTURES
Volume 269, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114803

Keywords

Concrete filled steel tube (CFST); Thin-walled steel tube; Concrete-encased column connection; Seismic performance; Sectional strength

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U20A20312]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An improved type of CECCs for circular CFST piers is proposed in this paper, and its seismic performance is experimentally investigated. The results show that the proposed CECCs have good energy dissipation capacity and load-bearing capacity.
An improved type of concrete-encased column connections (CECCs) for circular concrete filled steel tube (CFST) piers is proposed in this paper, which does not require the use of base plates and anchor bolts. The seismic performance of the proposed CECC for circular CFST piers was experimentally investigated. Four CECC speci-mens were tested under a constant axial load and cyclic lateral loads to investigate the effects of the rein-forcement ratio in the steel tube and the thickness of outer reinforced concrete component. The test results show that all test specimens failed flexurally primarily and the lateral load versus displacement hysteresis curve was generally full, indicating a good energy dissipation capacity (with a ductility coefficient >3.5). The strength degradation, stiffness degradation, and energy dissipation coefficient were calculated to study the seismic per-formance of proposed CECCs. The axial and lateral load versus the strain development of steel tube and anchor bars curves were further investigated to analyze the load transfer mechanism. The calculation methods for the sectional strengths of both CFST section and bottom section are proposed, which are found to be in good agreement with the test results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available