4.7 Article

Effects of thermal history on sensitization behavior and Charpy impact property of type 316L and 316 stainless steels for applications in a fired heater

Journal

ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS
Volume 141, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106672

Keywords

Sensitization; Charpy impact; Type 316L/316 stainless steels; Isothermal aging; sigma-phase

Funding

  1. Thaioil Public Company Limited
  2. Thaioil Public Company Limited, Thailand [P1451167]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compares the sensitization behavior and impact properties of 316L and 316 stainless steel treated at different temperatures. The results show that 316L stainless steel has lower sensitization and higher impact energy, while 316 stainless steel exhibits the opposite.
Type 316L stainless steel (SS) reveals its superior corrosion resistance against uniform and localized corrosion. But, it might be prone to intergranular corrosion (IGC) and intergranular stress corrosion cracking (IGSCC) due to detrimental Cr-rich carbides formed along the grain boundaries. The present investigation was aimed to study the sensitization behavior and Charpy impact property of type 316L SS experienced isothermally aging at 650, 750 and 850 degrees C for 2 h to compare with type 316 SS exposed to the actual service at temperature between 800 and 900 degrees C for nearly 20 years. The results indicated that the degree of sensitization (DOS) values of below 0.5 % were obtained for type 316L SS, whereas type 316 SS revealed its DOS value of around 48 %. The presence of sigma-phase transformed from delta-ferrite was a predominant factor to lower the Charpy impact energy of type 316L SS. The grain boundary Cr-rich carbide network played a key role in decreasing the Charpy impact energy of type 316 SS with indicating an intergranular fracture mode.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available