4.7 Article

Time series analysis of environmental quality in the state of Qatar

Journal

ENERGY POLICY
Volume 168, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113089

Keywords

GHGs emissions; Environmental degradation; ARDL technique; Unit root test with structural breaks; Qatar

Funding

  1. NPRP award from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of Qatar Foundation) [NPRP13S-0206-200272]
  2. Qatar National Library (QNL)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the impact of economic growth, electricity consumption, energy consumption, and the crop production index on environmental quality in Qatar. The results show that electricity consumption, energy consumption, and the crop production index have a positive relationship with greenhouse gas emissions, while economic growth has a negative relationship in the long term.
This study investigated the impact of economic growth, electricity consumption, energy consumption, and the crop production index on environmental quality in Qatar by considering four different types of GHGs emissions (carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and F-GHGs) and using a time-series dataset for the period of 1990-2019. This study investigated the long- and short-term impacts between these variables using ARDL bounds testing, while the stationarity properties of the variables were tested by applying the Zivot-Andrews test. The results indicate that electricity consumption, energy consumption, and the crop production index have a positive and significant relationship with GHGs, while economic growth has a negative and significant relationship in the long term with these gases. The VECM Cranger and Toda-Yamamoto causality tests were used to understand the causal relationship between the variables, and the results suggest a different causality relationship between the variables. Several key policy implications derived from the findings of this research to sustain environmental quality in the state of Qatar are discussed in this paper.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available