4.7 Article

Technology characteristics that influence adoption of residential distributed energy resources: Adapting Rogers' framework

Journal

ENERGY POLICY
Volume 168, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113153

Keywords

Technology characteristics; Diffusion of innovation; Distributed energy resources (DERs); Technology adoption

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper extends and adapts Rogers' theory to address the unique features of residential DERs, providing a classification scheme and assessment tool to understand and overcome the technology characteristics hindering adoption.
Distributed energy resources (DERs) present an important opportunity to lower the carbon intensity of residential buildings but face numerous barriers to adoption. This paper extends and adapts Rogers' theory of the role of technology characteristics in the diffusion of innovation (Rogers, 1962) to address the unique features of resi-dential DERs. A structured review of the academic and industry literature was conducted to gather data on the technology characteristics that influence residential DER adoption. Careful coding, analysis, and operationali-zation of the technology characteristics yielded 14 that are relevant, applicable, specific, independent, and distinct from each other. The 14 technology characteristics and logic behind their identification comprise a classification scheme to guide the exploration of how the technology characteristics of residential DERs influence their adoption. Building on that framework, an assessment tool was developed to evaluate technology adopt-ability, facilitate comparisons across technologies, and identify the specific technology characteristics that pose a challenge for each DER. The framework and the assessment tool can be used by researchers, practitioners, and policymakers to better understand and address the technology characteristics that hinder adoption of residential DERs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available