4.7 Article

Energy poverty in Slovakia: Officially defined, but misrepresented in major policies

Journal

ENERGY POLICY
Volume 168, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113095

Keywords

Energy poverty; Slovakia; Energy justice; Spatial justice

Funding

  1. Masaryk University research project Perspectives of European Integration [MUNI/A/1240/2021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Slovakia, with an official energy poverty definition, lags behind in alleviating energy poverty and faces concerns about fairness. The multidimensional nature and specificities of energy poverty are not fully recognized in major policies, along with shortcomings in distribution and participation.
Slovakia is one of the few countries with an official energy poverty definition. Nevertheless, it is listed among the ten most lagging EU Member States in terms of progress in alleviating energy poverty. There are also concerns about the fairness of measures to combat it. This paper builds on the energy justice perspective and a spatially -sensitive evaluation to critically analyse Slovak policies directly and indirectly tackling the issue. Do they reflect the three fundamental pillars of energy justice? And, given the issue's uneven socio-spatial occurrence in the country, are these policies designed and implemented to reduce pre-existing inequalities? We reveal that the multidimensional nature and specificities of energy poverty in Slovakia remain misrecognized in major policies. Moreover, there are shortcomings in the policies' distributional and participatory aspects. Most importantly, social welfare benefits are hard to access for energy-poor households, as are energy efficiency support schemes. Though some policies address dimensions linked to the issue, energy poverty's uneven incidence is not reflected. We conclude by pointing to the untapped potential of major policies in solving the problem.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available