4.5 Article

The Social Efficiency of Electricity Transition Policies Based on Renewables. Which Ways of Improvement?

Journal

ENERGY JOURNAL
Volume 43, Issue 6, Pages 195-216

Publisher

INT ASSOC ENERGY ECONOMICS
DOI: 10.5547/01956574.43.6.mvil

Keywords

Electricity; Transition; Planning; Renewables; Flexibility

Funding

  1. Chaire European Electricity Markets (CEEM) of the Universite Paris-Dauphine under the aegis of the Foundation Paris-Dauphine
  2. RTE
  3. EDF
  4. EPEX Spot
  5. Total Direct Energie

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a methodology to evaluate the interplay between renewable energy goals and CO2 caps in the electricity sector, using a detailed power system model. The research shows that renewable energy development is limited without subsidies, and technical externalities can create trade-offs between renewable energy penetration and environmental effectiveness.
Climate and energy policies use to be embedded in joint packages with seeming coherent goals on which the electricity sector is targeted. However, the complexity of power systems is rarely fully apprehended while setting up such packages, particularly when technical externalities from variable renewable energies (VRE) become widespread and different sources of flexibility need to be considered. We use a detailed power system model subject to a combination of RE goals and CO2 caps to seize their interplays and propose a methodology to rank the resulting equilibriums in terms of environmental effectiveness and economic efficiency. We show that: only modest levels of VRE develop without subsidies regardless the level of the CO2 cap; technical externalities create trade-offs between VRE penetration and environmental effectiveness; new flexibility technologies may correct or exacerbate these externalities, impacting effectiveness, costs, and coherence of such packages, requiring a sensitive target hierarchization and fine-tuning of such instruments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available