4.7 Article

Thermochemical recuperation by steam methane reforming as an efficient alternative to steam injection in the gas turbines

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 258, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124913

Keywords

Methane; Gas turbine; Thermochemical recuperation; Hydrogen-rich fuel; Thermodynamic analysis

Funding

  1. Russian Science Foundation [19-19-00327]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Improving the energy efficiency of gas turbines is a crucial task for the global energy industry. This paper presents a thermodynamic analysis of a gas turbine unit with thermochemical exhaust heat recuperation, and the results show that it provides higher efficiency compared to steam injection systems.
Improving the energy efficiency of gas turbines is an extremely important task of the world energy industry. This paper presents the results of thermodynamic analysis of a gas turbine unit with thermochemical exhaust heat recuperation by steam methane reforming (chemically recuperated gas turbine - CRGT). The thermochemical exhaust heat recuperation systems consist of a reformer, a steam-methane mixture preheater, and a steam generator. The main goal of this paper is comparing CRGT efficiency with the efficiency of a gas turbine unit with steam injection (STIG). To calculate the recuperated heat in a reformer, the thermodynamic analysis of steam methane reforming was performed via Gibbs free energy minimization method. Both thermodynamic cycle and reforming analysis were performed via Aspen HYSYS. The analysis was performed in the temperature range of working fluid at a turbine inlet (T-in) of 800-1300 ? and the steam-to-methane ratio of 1, 2, 3 (mol-to-mol). The results showed that thermochemical exhaust heat recuperation can be considered as an alternative to steam injection in gas turbines. The efficiency of CRGT is higher than the efficiency of STIG for the same steam-to-methane ratio. With increasing in T-in the efficiency of CRGT is increasing. The efficiency of STIG and CRGT at T-in=1300 ? for a steam-to-methane ratio of 3 is 37.4% and 47.3%, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available