4.5 Article

Parallelized continuous flow dielectrophoretic separation of DNA

Journal

ELECTROPHORESIS
Volume 44, Issue 11-12, Pages 968-977

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/elps.202200174

Keywords

continuous flow; dielectrophoresis; high-throughput; purification; separation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work presents a microfluidic device with parallelized dielectrophoretic separations of small biological samples. The device utilizes insulator-based DEP for selective separation and achieves high separation purity and fast purification.
Numerous microfluidic separation applications have been shown in the past years providing a fast analysis of biological samples like DNA or proteins. Microfluidic separation based on dielectrophoresis (DEP), that is the migration of a polarizable object in an inhomogeneous electric field, provides numerous advantages. However, the main drawback of DEP separation devices is that they are not sufficient for large-scale sample purification due to the lack of high sample throughput. In this work, we present for the first time a microfluidic device with two parallelized dielectrophoretic separations of (biological) samples smaller than 1 mu m. The separation is carried out by means of insulator-based DEP, that is an insulating ridge reduced the flow through height and thus created a nanoslit at which the selective DEP forces occur. The device consists of a cross injector, two parallel operation regions and separate harvesting reservoirs where the samples are collected. Each DEP operation region contains an insulating ridge. We successfully demonstrate the separation of 100 and 40 nm beads and 10 and 5 kbp DNA with a separation purity of more than 80%. This states the proof-of-concept for up-scaling of dielectrophoretic separation by parallelization. As the present technique is virtually label-free, it offers a fast purification, for example in the production of gene vaccines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available