4.6 Article

An insight into the polymerization process of the selected carbazole derivatives - why does it not always lead to a polymer formation?

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 429, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.140948

Keywords

Carbazole derivative; Di(thienyl)carbazole; Quantum-chemistry simulation; UV-vis-NIR spectroelectrochemistry; Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy

Funding

  1. Polish National Science Foundation (NCN) [2015/19/B/ST4/03743]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the electrochemical polymerization behavior of two carbazole derivatives, CNZ1 and CNZ2. The formation of thin poly(CNZ1) film and thick poly(CNZ2) film, as well as the difference in UV-vis-NIR absorption intensity and radical formation, suggests different behavior between the two monomers. The study combines spectroelectrochemistry, scanning electron microscopy, and quantum-chemistry calculations to shed light on the observed differences.
Among numerous monomers of carbazole derivatives, some reveal intriguing differences in their electrochemical polymerization behavior. Two such monomers, namely, 9-(2-naphthalen-2-yl)-9H-carbazole, CNZ1, and 9-(naphthalen-2-yl)-3,6-di(thiophen-2-yl)-9H-carbazole, CNZ2, were herein studied to a greater detail. The main research focus was to elucidate the electropolymerization mechanism of both monomers. The monomers were electro-oxidized to form polymer films on electrodes. When CNZ1 and CNZ2 were electro-oxidized under the same conditions, the overall charge passed was 115 and 1500 mu C, respectively, suggesting the formation of a very thin poly(CNZ1) film and, in contrast, a thick poly(CNZ2) film. The polymers electrochemically behaved reversibly at electrodes. They were characterized by a combined UV-vis-NIR and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroelectrochemistry. The UV-vis-NIR absorption intensity for the poly(CNZ1) film was 10 times lower than for its monomer, but the poly(CNZ2) film behaved differently. The number of radicals formed in poly(CNZ1) during the electro-oxidation was similar to 30 times lower than in poly(CNZ2). We examined the formation of different charge carriers and their concentration evolution using in-situ spectroelectrochemical methods. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging revealed a continuous and granular morphology of poly(CNZ1) and poly(CNZ2) films, respectively. UV-vis-NIR and EPR spectroelectrochemistry coupled with quantum-chemistry calculations enabled us to shine more light on differences in the behavior observed. For CNZ1, the radical is delocalized over the whole molecule. That can lead to a lower reactivity, thus preventing the formation of long polymer chains. In contrast, the radical delocalization is much more restricted to the carbazole-thiophene moiety for CNZ2. Consequently, this inccreased localization leads to the formation of long polymer chains.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available