4.7 Article

Influence of TiO2 nanocomposite UV filter surface chemistry and their interactions with organic UV filters on uptake and toxicity toward cultured fish gill cells

Journal

ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY
Volume 243, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113984

Keywords

Nanoparticle; Mixture; in vitro; Ecotoxicity; Sunscreen; Interference

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning FORMAS [2016-00742]
  2. German Research Foun-dation [276093679]
  3. Helge Axelsson Johnsons Stiftelse [F20-0491]
  4. Stiftelsen Wilhelm och Mar-tina Lundgrens Vetenskapsfond [253157706]
  5. AMI grant program from the University of Montpellier
  6. Centre for Cellular Imaging (CCI) at the University of Gothenburg [VR-RFI 2016-00968]
  7. Formas [2016-00742] Funding Source: Formas

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the toxicity of three different nanosized TiO2 UV filters and found that they were not cytotoxic to cells, but exhibited differences in cellular uptake. Additionally, the presence of nanoparticles tended to decrease the toxicity of organic UV filters, potentially due to reduced availability of the organic filters due to adsorption to the nanoparticle surface.
Aquatic environments have been found to be contaminated with a variety of inorganic and organic UV filters. This includes novel nano-sized titanium dioxide (TiO2) composite particles, which have been increasingly developed and incorporated into commercial sunscreens in recent years. So far, relatively little is known about the effects of this novel class of UV filters on aquatic life. Therefore, this study aimed to determine and compare the toxicity of three such nanoparticulate TiO2 UV filters with different surface coatings, namely Eusolex (R) T-Avo (SiO2-coated), T-LiteTM SF (Al(OH)(3)/PDMS-coated), and Eusolex (R) T-S (Al(2)O3/stearic acid-coated) either alone, or in the presence of selected organic UV filters (octinoxate, avobenzone, octocrylene), toward fish using RTgill-W1 cell cultures as an in vitro experimental model. Besides standard exposure protocols, alternative approaches (i.e., exposure to water accommodated fractions (WAFs), hanging-drop exposure) were explored to account for nanoparticle (NP)-specific fate in the medium and obtain additional/complementary information on their toxicity in different conditions. The AlamarBlue, CFDA-AM and Neutral Red Retention (NR) assays were used to measure effects on different cellular endpoints. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to examine NP uptake. Our results showed that none of the TiO2 NP UV filters were cytotoxic at the concentrations tested (0.1-10 mu g/mL; 24 h) but there were differences in their uptake by the cells. Thus, only the hydrophilic T-AVO was detected inside cells, but the hydrophobic T-Lite SF and T-S were not. In addition, our results show that the presence of NPs (or the used dispersant) tended to decrease organic UV filter toxicity. The level of combination effect depended on both NP-type (surface chemistry) and concentration, suggesting that the reduced toxicity resulted from reduced availability of the organic UV filters due to their adsorption to the NP surface. Thus, mixtures of TiO2 NP UV filters and organic UV filters may have a different toxicological profile compared to the single substances, but probably do not pose an increased hazard.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available