4.4 Article

A seniors exercise park program for older adults with mild balance dysfunction - a feasibility study

Journal

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
Volume 45, Issue 19, Pages 3143-3154

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2112984

Keywords

Outdoor; physical activity; mobility; balance; falls

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the feasibility of a multimodal exercise program conducted at a Seniors Exercise Park for older adults with mild balance dysfunction. The findings suggest that this program is feasible, safe, and improves physical and psychosocial health outcomes in older adults.
Purpose To evaluate the feasibility of a multimodal exercise program conducted at a Seniors Exercise Park among older adults with mild balance dysfunction. Methods Participants (aged >= 65 years) with mild balance dysfunction underwent 18 weeks of gradual reduction of supervised training followed by six weeks of independent training at the Seniors Exercise Park. Feasibility and safety were assessed at baseline, 18 and 24 weeks. Results Seventy-five participants expressed interest in the program. Of the 46 participants enrolled in the study, 36 (78.3%) completed the 18 week intervention, and 32 (69.6%) were followed-up at 24 weeks. The median adherence to supervised training was 90.9%, and independent practice was 26.3% (weeks 19-24). All the supervised training sessions were completed within 18 weeks. No falls, or adverse events occurred. All physical performance (e.g., balance, lower body strength, and mobility), psychosocial health outcomes (e.g., mental wellbeing) and quality of life improved significantly at 18 and 24 weeks. Conclusions This initially supervised Seniors Exercise Park program which progressed to independent practice is feasible, safe, and improved health outcomes in older adults with mild balance dysfunction. Strategies are needed to improve adherence to independent practice and minimise dropouts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available