4.4 Article

Conservative management for lumbar radiculopathy based on the stage of the disorder: a Delphi study

Journal

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
Volume 45, Issue 21, Pages 3539-3548

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2130448

Keywords

Lumbar radiculopathy; sciatica; conservative management; Delphi procedure; expert opinion

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to establish consensus on effective conservative treatment modalities for lumbar radiculopathy (LR) across different stages. Experts agree that the effectiveness of interventions differs through the evolution of LR.
Purpose Conservative management of lumbar radiculopathy (LR) is the first treatment option. To date, systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines have not considered the most appropriate timing of management. This study aimed to establish consensus on effective conservative treatment modalities across different stages (i.e., acute, sub-acute, or chronic) of LR. Materials and methods Through an iterative multistage Delphi process, experts rated agreement with proposed treatment modalities across stages of LR and could suggest additional treatment modalities. The agreement was measured using a 5-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics were used to measure agreement (median, interquartile ranges, and percentage of agreement). Consensus criteria were defined a priori for each round. Results Fourteen panelists produced a consensus list of effective treatment modalities across stages of LR. Acute stage management should focus on providing patients with information about the condition including pain education, individualized physical activity, and directional preference exercises, supported with NSAIDs. In the sub-acute stage, strength training and neurodynamic mobilization could be added and transforaminal/epidural injections considered. In the chronic stage, spinal manipulative therapy, specific exercise, and function-specific physical training should be combined with individualized vocational, ergonomic and postural advice. Conclusions Experts agree effectiveness of interventions differs through the evolution of LR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available