4.5 Article

Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in weight outcomes, cardiovascular events, and mortality in the look AHEAD trial

Journal

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 192, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2022.110095

Keywords

Lifestyle intervention; Race; ethnicity; Socioeconomic status; Health disparity

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health
  2. [F32DK127545]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Participants from different races/ethnicities or socioeconomic status may not benefit equally in intensive lifestyle interventions for type 2 diabetes. Black and Hispanic participants had less weight loss compared to White participants, while participants with lower educational attainment benefited more from the interventions.
Background: Intensive lifestyle interventions (ILI) for type 2 diabetes (T2D) improve health outcomes, but participants from different races/ethnicities or socioeconomic status may not benefit equally.Methods: Within the Look AHEAD trial, we examined achievement of the 7% weight loss goal, as well as secondary weight, cardiovascular, and mortality outcomes, by race/ethnicity and educational attainment (EA).Results: Among 4,640 participants (31 % Black or Hispanic, 13 % with less than a high school degree), Black and Hispanic participants were less likely than White participants to achieve 7 % weight loss in both the ILI (45.8 % v. 60.7 %, p < 0.001 and 53.0 % v. 60.7 %, p = 0.01, respectively) and diabetes support and education (DSE) arms. Contrastingly, participants with less than a high school degree were more likely in the ILI but less likely in the DSE arm to achieve this goal, with a significant arm by EA interaction. Hispanic participants and those with lowest EA also experienced decreased mortality in the ILI versus the DSE arm.Conclusions: All Look AHEAD participant subgroups achieved greater weight loss from ILI; however, Black and Hispanic participants lost less weight than White participants in both arms, while those with lowest EA benefited disproportionately from the ILI compared to participants with higher EA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available