4.6 Article

with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Journal

DIABETES & METABOLISM
Volume 49, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MASSON EDITEUR
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabet.2022.101393

Keywords

H1-Antihistamines; Hepatocellular Carcinoma; incidence rate ratio; Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; dose -dependent

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the association between H1-antihistamine use and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients without hepatitis B or C virus infection. The results showed that the use of antihistamines significantly reduced the risk of HCC in these patients, and a dose-response relationship was observed.
Purpose: H1-antihistamines (AHs) may exert protective effects against cancer. We investigated the association of AH use with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients without hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Methods: The data of patients with T2DM enrolled from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database were examined for the period of January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2018. We used the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression to evaluate the AH use-HCC risk association. Results: After 1:1 propensity score matching was performed, the two cohorts were each divided into AH users (n = 47,990) and nonusers (n = 47,990). The risk of HCC was significantly lower in AH users than in AH nonusers (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.55 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.46 to 0.67; IRR: 0.70; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.84), respectively. The dose-response relationship between AH use and HCC risk was also observed (aHRs: 0.58, 0.56, 0.50, and 0.41 for 28-35, 36-49, 50-77, and >77 cumulative defined daily doses of AH, respectively). Conclusion: AH use can reduce HCC risk in T2DM patients without HBV or HCV infection in a dose-dependent manner.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available