4.1 Article

A myeloperoxidase enhancer drives myeloid cell-specific labeling in a transgenic frog line

Journal

DEVELOPMENT GROWTH & DIFFERENTIATION
Volume 64, Issue 7, Pages 362-367

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dgd.12803

Keywords

blood cells; myeloid; peroxidase; transgenic; Xenopus

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education [20K06729]
  2. Waseda University
  3. Niigata University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a myeloid cell-specific enhancer was identified in the 5' flanking region of the Xenopus tropicalis myeloperoxidase gene. Using transgenic reporter analysis, myeloid cells in tadpoles were successfully labeled with GFP, allowing for the study of their physiological role. The results showed that GFP-positive cells were predominantly found in tail fin macrophages and liver myeloid cells, providing valuable insights into the distribution and function of myeloid cells in Xenopus tadpoles.
We have identified a myeloid cell-specific enhancer in the 5 ' flanking region of the Xenopus tropicalis myeloperoxidase gene. Transgenic reporter analysis using Xenopus laevis revealed that the expression of GFP was detected in the tail fin macrophages of a swimming tadpole, and the distributions of the GFP-positive and XL-2 (a pan-marker for leukocytes)-positive cells were mostly overlapping. The GFP-positive cells in the liver of the transgenic tadpole were localized in the same areas where the myeloid cells were present. Isolation of leukocytes from the peripheral blood cells followed by flow cytometric analysis revealed that the GFP-positive fraction was specifically enriched in neutrophils with lobulated nuclei. Furthermore, the macrophages purified from the peritoneal cavity were also GFP-positive. In summary, a transgenic frog line in which the myeloid cells are labeled with GFP provides a useful tool to elucidate the physiological role of myeloid cells of multiple origins in the embryo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available